Introduction to Public Speaking – Week 3 Lecture

Chapters 5-6 Outline

 

In Week 3, we’re looking carefully at the role that external research plays in the speech development process. Public speaking is inherently personal, so it might come as a surprise that your words aren’t enough in a speech. Effective public speakers pull in external research, as it helps them further develop their claims and shows the audience that the speaker has done their due diligence to pull together an argument that is sound, logical, ethical, and correct. Chapter 5 builds upon last week’s readings, and focuses on the methods for adapting precisely to the audience during a speech, by demonstrating the relevance of your topic, acknowledging initial audience disposition toward your topic, establishing common ground, gaining credibility, ensuring information comprehension and retention, and managing language and cultural differences. In chapter 6, we divide the research process into three main sections. This chapter navigates the critical steps in the location, retrieval, and evaluation of both print and web-based information and their sources. The final section focuses on recording researched information, and addresses the importance of verbally citing sources.

Each week, you should actively review the readings. To assist in your retention, in these weekly written lectures you can find both an outline of the chapter and glossary of key terms. These are included to help you as you read the chapters. Use the outlines as a mechanism to take notes—fill in the gaps, make connections to your personal life, and reflect on your growth.

 

CHAPTER FIVE OUTLINE

Introduction (p. 79): Audience adaptation—the process of tailoring your speech’s information to the needs, interests, and expectations of your listeners—plays a critical role in the speech planning process. After dealing with issues of relevance, comprehension, credibility, audience attitudes, and cultural and linguistic differences, a speaker is able to generate a plan of adaptation, which will serve as the blueprint for speech construction.

I.      Initial audience disposition: the knowledge and opinions listeners have about your topic before they hear you speak (p. 79).

A.       Adapting to the initial audience disposition means creating a speech that takes into account how much audience members already know about your topic and what their attitudes are toward it.

B.        During speech preparation, choose specific supporting material with these initial attitudes in mind.

II.    Common ground: the perception that you are knowledgeable, trustworthy, and personable (p. 80).

A.        Use personal pronouns: “we,” “us,” and “our.”

1.       Personal pronouns establish common ground.

2.       By using “us” instead of “people,” the speaker includes the audience members and thus gives them a stake in listening to what follows.

B.        Ask rhetorical questions that stimulate a mental response rather than an actual spoken response on the part of the audience

1.       Rhetorical questions establish common ground because they stimulate a shared response among audience members.

2.       They are often used in speech introductions but can also be effective as transitions and in other parts of the speech.

C.        Draw from common experiences: share personal stories and experiences.

III.   Relevance: adapting information in ways that help audience members realize its importance to them (p. 81).

A.    First, emphasize the timeliness of a topic by demonstrating that it is useful to the audience at present, or will be in the near future.

B.     Second, emphasize the proximity of the topic by explaining its relevance to listeners’ personal life space.

C.     Third, emphasize personal impact of your topic—its potential for serious physical, economic, or psychological impact on audience members.

IV.  Speaker credibility: the perception of a speaker as knowledgeable, trustworthy, and personable (p. 82).

A.    Articulate knowledge and expertise. The audience’s assessment of your knowledge and expertise depends on how well you convince them that you are qualified to speak on the topic.

1.       You can establish your expertise directly by disclosing your experience with your topic, including formal education, special study, demonstrated skill, and your “track record.”

2.       Audience members can also assess your expertise through indirect means, such as how well prepared you seem and how confident and fluent you are.

B.     Convey trustworthiness, the extent to which the audience can believe that what you say is accurate, true, and in their best interests.

1.       Consider how to demonstrate that you are honest, industrious, dependable, and ethical.

2.       How trustworthy you appear will also depend on how the audience views your motives.

C.     Display personableness, the extent to which you convey a pleasing personality

1.       Manage first impressions by dressing appropriately for the audience and occasion, speaking well, smiling, and carrying yourself well.

2.       Use appropriate humor to demonstrate personableness.

V.    Information comprehension and retention: adapting information so that it is easier for audience members to follow and retain (p. 84).

A.        Appeal to diverse learning styles, a person’s preferred way of receiving information, so that audience members with different learning styles can comprehend the information. Consider presenting new information in ways that appeal to watching and feeling and doing and thinking.

B.        Orient the audience with transitions, a sentence or two that summarizes one main point and introduces another, to avoid confusing listeners.

C.        Choose specific and familiar language to make sure your listeners understand the meaning you intend.

1.       Specific words clear up the confusion caused by general words by narrowing the focus in some way.

2.       Avoid jargon and slang terms unless:

a.   You define them clearly the first time you use them; and

b.  They are central to your speech goal.

D.        Use vivid language and examples because they help audience members understand and remember abstract, complex, and novel material.

E.         Comparing unfamiliar ideas with familiar ones is an easy way to adapt your material to your audience. You will want to identify places where you can use adaptive comparisons.

VI.  Language and cultural differences: taking into consideration variations in speech practice and perceived effectiveness when addressing an audience composed of people from ethnic and language groups other than your own (p. 88).

A.        Work to be understood when speaking in your second language.

1.       When the language spoken by the audience is different from the speaker’s native language, audience members may have difficulty understanding what the speaker is saying due to accents, mispronounced words, inappropriate words, or misused idioms.

a.    To help the audience, speakers can speak more slowly and articulate their words as much as possible to give audience members time to “adjust their ear” to more easily process what the speaker is saying.

b.    Practicing in front of friends and associates who are native speakers is one of the best ways to improve second-language speaking.

2.       The more you practice speaking the language, the more comfortable you will become with it and with your ability to relate to audience members.

B.         Choose culturally appropriate supporting material.

1.       A good speaker will learn as much as possible about the culture of audience members, in order to develop the material in a way that is meaningful to them. This may mean conducting additional research.

2.       A speaker may need to elaborate on ideas that would be self- explanatory in your own culture.

VII.     Forming a specific audience adaptation plan by identifying the challenges presented by the audience and planning how to meet them (p. 88). The adaptation plan should answer the following questions:

A.        What is my audience’s initial disposition toward my topic?

B.        What common ground do my audience members share with one another and with me?

C.        How relevant will the audience find this material?

D.        What can I do to enhance my credibility?

E.         How can I make it easier for my audience members to comprehend and remember the information?

F.         What language or cultural differences do my audience members have with one another and with me?

 

CHAPTER SIX OUTLINE

Introduction (p. 93): Obtaining the necessary material used in speech construction requires three key elements: locating and evaluating a variety of information types and sources, identifying and selecting relevant information, and citing key sources appropriately.

I.        Locate and evaluate information sources (p. 93).

A.    Personal knowledge and experience.

1.       By selecting a familiar topic, a speaker can rely on personal examples and experiences in the speech.

2.       Sharing your personal knowledge and experience can also bolster your credibility if you share your credentials – your experiences or education that qualifies you to speak with authority on a specific subject.

B.     Secondary research: the process of locating information that has been discovered by other people.

1.       Locate sources by searching the Internet, online libraries and databases, blogs, online social networks, and at a local library.

2.       Types of secondary sources.

a.       Encyclopedias can serve as a good starting point, but because they only provide overviews, they should never be the only source.

b.       Books: if the topic has been around for more than six months, there are likely to be books written on the subject.

c.       Articles, which may contain more current or highly specialized information on your topic than a book would, are published in periodicals—magazines and journals that appear at regular intervals.

d.       News media are excellent sources of facts about and interpretations of both contemporary and historical issues, but most writers of news media articles are journalists who are not experts on the topics they write about.

e.       Statistical sources present numerical information on a wide variety of subjects.

f.        Biographies give accounts of a person’s life, from thumbnail sketches to reasonably complete essays.

g.       Quotation books and websites can provide quotations that can be provocative as well as informative.

h.       Government documents may provide useful information if your topic is related to public policy.

3.       Skimming to determine source value. Skimming is a method of rapidly going through a work to determine what is covered and how.

a.       Assess whether an article really presents information on the exact area of the topic you are exploring and whether it contains any documented statistics, examples, or quotable opinions.

b.       Read the abstract—a short paragraph summarizing the research findings.

4.       Evaluating sources to determine their accuracy, reliability, and validity. There are four criteria to use:

a.       Authority: test the expertise of a resource’s author and/or the reputation of the publishing or sponsoring organization.

b.       Objectivity: be wary of information that is overly slanted.

c.       Currency: newer information is more accurate than older.

d.       Relevance: relevant information is directly related to the topic and supports your main points, making your speech easier to follow and understand.

C.     Primary research: the process of conducting your own study in the real world to acquire the information you need. It is much more labor intensive and time consuming than secondary research.

1.       Fieldwork observations: also known as ethnography, go into the field to observe specific behaviors and take notes on your observations.

2.       Surveys: a canvassing of people in order to get information about their ideas and opinions, which are then analyzed for trends.

3.       Interviews: planned, structured conversations where one person asks questions and another answers them.

a.       Selecting the best person who has expertise in the topic area and can provide quality information.

b.       Preparing the interview protocol, the list of questions you plan to ask.

i.               Primary questions are the lead-in questions about one of the major topics of the interview, typically related to the main points for the speech.

ii.                Secondary questions are follow-up questions designed to probe the answers given to primary questions.

iii.                 Open questions are broad-based questions that allow freedom regarding what specific information or opinions the interviewee may provide.

iv.                Closed questions are narrowly focused and require very brief answers.

v.               Neutral questions are phrased in a way that does not direct a person’s answers.

vi.                Leading questions are phrased in a way that suggests the interviewer has a preferred answer.

c.       Conducting the interview.

i.               Dress professionally to show you respect the interviewee’s time.

ii.                Be prompt.

iii.                 Be courteous. Begin by introducing yourself and the purpose for the interview. Thank the person for his or her time. Respect what the person says regardless of what you may think of the answer.

iv.                Ask for permission to record. If the interviewee says “no,” respect their wishes and take careful notes.

v.               Listen carefully.

vi.                Keep the interview moving.

vii.                  Monitor your nonverbal reactions to make sure that they are in keeping with the tone you want to communicate.

viii.                   Get permission to quote.

ix.                Confirm credentials.

x.               End on time.

xi.                Thank the interviewee.

d.       Processing the interview. As soon as possible after the interview, review any notes and make individual note cards (or transcribe) the information that will be included in the speech.

i.               Original artifact or document examination. If the information you need has not been published, it may exist in an original unpublished source, such as an ancient manuscript, a diary, personal correspondence, or company files.

ii.                Experiments: you can design a study to test a hypothesis you have and then report the results of your experiment in your speech.

II.     Select relevant information (p. 103).

A.        Factual statements: those statements that can be verified.

1.       Statistics: numerical facts.

a.     Use only statistics you can verify as reliable and valid.

b.    Use only recent statistics so your audience will not be misled.

c.     Use statistics comparatively.

d.    Use statistics sparingly.

e.     Display statistics visually.

f.     Remember that statistics are biased.

2.       Examples: specific instances that illustrate or explain a general factual statement.

a.     They provide concrete details that make a general statement meaningful to the audience.

b.    You may also use hypothetical examples—specific illustrations based on reflections about future events.

c.     When using examples, make sure they are clear, they are representative, and use at least one to support every generalization.

3.       Definitions: a statement that clarifies the meaning of a word of phrase.

a.     Definitions clarify the meaning of terminology that is specialized, technical, or otherwise likely to be unfamiliar to the audience.

b.    Definitions clarify words and terms that have more than one meaning and might be misconstrued.

c.     Definitions clarify your stance on a subject.

B.        Expert opinions: interpretations and judgments made by authorities in a particular subject area.

1.       An expert is someone who has mastered a specific subject, usually through long-term study, and is recognized by other people in the field as being a knowledgeable and trustworthy authority.

2.       When you use expert opinions in your speech, you should always cite the credentials of the expert.

C.        Elaborations: factual information and expert opinions can be elaborated upon through anecdotes and narratives, comparisons and contrasts, or quotations.

1.       Anecdotes and narratives help capture the audience’s attention.

a.     Anecdotes are brief, often amusing stories.

b.    Narratives are accounts, personal experiences, tales, or lengthier stories.

2.       Comparisons and contrasts.

a.     Comparisons illuminate a point by showing similarities. They can be literal or figurative.

1.   Literal comparisons show similarities of real things.

2.   Figurative comparisons express one thing in terms

a.       normally denoting another.

b.    Contrasts highlight differences.

3.      Quotations that make a point in a clear and vivid way. When using a direct quotation, you need to verbally acknowledge the person it came from to prevent plagiarism—the unethical act of representing another person’s work as your own.

D.        Drawing information from a variety of cultural perspectives. How we perceive facts and what opinions we hold are influenced by our cultural background; therefore, it is important to draw information from culturally diverse perspectives by seeking sources that have differing cultural orientations and by interviewing experts with diverse cultural backgrounds.

III.  Record information and sources (p. 108).

A.        Annotated bibliography: a preliminary record of the relevant sources you find pertaining to your topic.

1.       This would include a short summary of the information in your sources and how it might be used in your speech.

2.       A good annotated bibliography includes:

a.     Complete citation for each source using appropriate style.

b.    A sentence or two summarizing pertinent information.

c.     A sentence or two explaining how information supports your speech.

d.    Any direct quotations you might wish to use.

B.        Research cards: individual index cards or electronic facsimiles that identify the following:

1.       One piece of information relevant to your speech.

2.       A key word or theme the information represents.

3.       Bibliographic data identifying.

IV.  Cite sources (p. 109).

A.        You need to acknowledge the sources of your ideas and statements.

B.        Citing sources helps the audience evaluate the content and also adds to your credibility

C.        You must provide oral footnotes—reference to an original source—at the point in the speech where information from that source is presented.

 

GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS

common ground:
the perception of a speaker as knowledgeable, trustworthy, and personable

credibility: the perception of a speaker as knowledgeable, trustworthy, and personable

initial audience disposition: the knowledge and opinions listeners have about your topic before they hear you speak

learning style: a person’s preferred way of receiving information

personableness: the extent to which you project a pleasing personality

personal pronouns: “we,” “us,” and “our”—pronouns that directly link the speaker to members of the audience

proximity: the relevance of information to the listener’s personal space

relevance: adapting information in ways that help audience members realize its importance to them

rhetorical questions: questions phrased to stimulate a mental response from the audience

timeliness: showing how information is useful now or in the near future

trustworthiness: the extent to which the audience can believe that what you say is accurate, true, and in their best interests

abstract: a short paragraph summarizing the research findings

accurate sources: attempt to present unbiased information and often include a balanced discussion of controversial topics

anecdotes: brief, often amusing stories

annotated bibliography: a preliminary record of the relevant sources

blogs: websites that provide a forum for the personal viewpoints of their author

closed questions: narrowly focused questions that require only very brief answers

comparison: illuminate a point by showing similarities

contrast: illuminate a point by highlighting differences

credentials: experiences or education that qualifies a presenter to speak with authority on a specific subject

definition: a statement that clarifies the meaning of a word or phrase

ethnography: a form of primary research based on fieldwork observations

evidence: any information that clarifies, explains, or otherwise adds depth or breadth to a topic

examples: specific instances that illustrate or explain a general factual statement

expert: a person recognized as having mastered a specific subject

expert opinions: interpretations and judgments made by authorities in particular subject areas

factual statements: information that can be verified

hypothesis: an educated guess about a cause-and-effect relationship between two or more things

hypothetical examples: specific instances based on reflections about future events

interview: a highly structured conversation where one person asks questions and another answers them

interview protocol: the list of questions to be asked

leading questions: questions phrased in a way that suggests the interviewer has a preferred answer

narratives: accounts, personal experiences, tales, or lengthier stories

neutral questions: questions phrased in a way that does not direct a person’s answers

online social networks: websites where communities of people interact with one another

open questions: broad-based queries

oral footnote: reference to an original source, made at the point in the speech where information from that source is presented

periodicals: magazines and journals published at regular intervals

plagiarism: the unethical act of representing another person’s work as your own by failing to credit the source

primary questions: introductory questions about each major interview topic

primary research: collecting data about a topic directly from the real world

rapport-building questions: nonthreatening questions designed to put the interviewee at ease and demonstrate respect

reliable sources: have a history of presenting valid and accurate information

research cards: individual index cards or electronic facsimiles identifying a piece of information, the key word or theme it represents, and its bibliographic data

secondary questions: follow-up questions designed to probe the answers given to primary questions

secondary research: locating information that has been discovered by other people

skimming: rapidly going through a work to determine what is covered and how

stance: an author’s attitude, perspective, or viewpoint on a topic

statistics: numerical facts

transcribe: word-for-word translation into written form of the interview

valid sources: report factual information that can be counted on to be true

 

Title: Grantham Copyright - Description: Grantham Copyright 2018