Week 1
assignment 2
|
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Beginning |
Inadequate |
Comprehension of Assignment |
Thoroughly addresses the five-step process of
analyzing ethical dilemmas. Provides
additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a full comprehension of the
subject matter – by aligning the five-step process to the scenario. |
Addresses at least three of the five-step
process of analyzing ethical dilemmas and associates the scenario to the
three processes identified from the five-step process. |
Addressed one of the five-step process of analyzing
ethical dilemmas and associates the step identified to the scenario. |
Did not address any of the five-step process
for analyzing ethical dilemmas and did not align the scenario with the
five-step process. |
Organization of Ideas |
Original ideas are effectively developed and
presented in a logical, sequential order throughout the entire assignment. |
Original ideas are effectively developed and
presented in a logical, sequential order within 70% of the assignment. |
Original ideas are minimal less than 25% of
the overall assignment. The organization is not presented in a logical
sequential order making it difficult to understand the writer. . |
No original ideas or organization present
throughout the entire assignment. The paper lacks no supporting evidence. |
Writing and research skills |
Mechanics
(spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are without error, including proficient
demonstration of in-text citations.
The in-text citations are accurately captured in the reference
section. |
Mechanics
spelling, grammar, and punctuation are minimal (Errors do not exceed 30% of
the submission).
Writer demonstrates an understanding of the use of in-text citations and
proper formation. Writer demonstrates the understanding of a properly
formatted reference page (errors are minimal) Example, Does not double space or indent. |
Errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and
punctuation) exceed 70% of the overall submission. Does not demonstrate the
use of in-text citations and proper formatting. Minimal use of resources
relevant to the subject matter are used. |
Assignment is incomprehensible due to
multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Lacks
supporting evidence (no citations or reference page). |
Technical application – of the assignment |
The assignment met the two to three page
length requirement and is double-spaced |
The assignment does not meet length
requirement but it at least 75% of the minimum requirement example, one page
and a half, double-spaced. |
The assignment does not meet the page length
requirement, but does meet 50% of the page length requirement. Example, one
full page, double-spaced. |
The assignment does not meet the page
requirement and is less than 50% of the page length requirement. |